HARPing on Home Loans

HARP stands for Home Affordable Refinance Program. If you’re not behind on your mortgage payments but have been unable to get traditional refinancing because the value of your home has declined, you may be eligible to refinance through the Program. HARP is designed to help you get a new, more affordable, more stable mortgage. HARP refinance loans require a loan application and underwriting process, and refinance fees will apply.

The existing program was enhanced in late 2011 by the Obama Administration and affects only those mortgages owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, which means most of us who have a mortgage on our homes. Other eligibility requirements include but are not limited to:

•The mortgage must have been sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac on or before May 31, 2009;
•The mortgage can not have been refinanced through HARP before;
•The current Loan-to-Value (LTV) must be greater than 80% (you owe more than the house is worth);
•The borrower must be current on the mortgage and have a 12 month good payment history.

Not all mortage brokers or lenders participate in HARP. Contacting your current mortgage holder is the second step. The first step is going to either the Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac website and completing the eligibility check form. It’s pretty simple and a quick way to see if the loan belongs to them.

FYI, the program ends December 31, 2013. I think it’s a good deal: if you have an upside-down adjustable rate mortgage, you can at least refinance into a fixed rate at the currently super low rates available. Hell, I’m considering it for my OWN mortgage!

Posted in Real Estate | Leave a comment

Women’s Work

IN PURSUIT of building my Real Estate practice, I started a BNI group several years ago. BNI is Business Networking International, and it’s a business about building other businesses through referrals. Most cities have lots and lots of chapters, because the first rule is there is only one member per profession in the group. As a real estate broker in Colorado, where every third person has a license, getting into a group requires biding your time until the realtor in the group leaves. Or, if you’re impatient, you start your own chapter!

There are a few professions that have a plethora of people, and so those professionals usually end up starting a chapter. Mine was no different; I started a chapter with a financial advisor and a mortgage broker. We invited others to join with us, and we’d see them a couple times and then nothing. It took nearly a year to reach critical mass, the number of registered and paid members required to become a fully-chartered chapter.

The concept is great: businesspeople meeting weekly, getting to know and trust each other so they can pass quality and highly-prepped referrals to each other. Over time, as people join or quit or are asked to leave, a chapter that starts out as a promising venture can change into something else. Or the opposite holds true, too.

The upshot was, after starting the chapter and showing up weekly (or getting a substitute when I couldn’t be there) and giving referrals to nearly every person in the chapter, I was asked to leave after three years. It was made clear to me that I was not needed, and I had wasted about $1000 in trying to get business from that membership. I’m not bitter–I just swore I would never join another referral group again and would find other ways to build my business.

Fast forward to present, and my life partner decided to create a referral group of only business women to build her practice. While some ideas are similar, the basic one is a small group of women nurturing each other to be successful. And I’m a sucker for stuff like that; it takes me back to my early Movement days of Sisterhood is Powerful. Right On Womyns.

So I’m meeting monthly with some lawyers, a financial advisor, a massage therapist and a couple other professional women. We read our business plans to each other at the last meeting. Among many interesting things about that exercise, I was pleased to note that my plan sounded better aloud than it did as I was writing it. Sometimes that voice in your head is wrong. Especially when it sounds like your mother.

Sometimes I can’t believe I’m in another referral group, but I find myself looking forward to the monthly meeting. I’m excited about helping other women get their businesses going, and I’m excited about the potential for getting my own business kick-started. My partner says studies have shown that women give referrals more readily than men. So for now, it’s all Cherche La Femme!!

Posted in Real Estate | Leave a comment

Runaway Election

IF YOU’RE IN DENVER, you know there’s a run-off for Mayor. Nearly every candidate for office I supported lost in the May vote. And I had such high hopes for some of them!

The race between Michael Hancock and Chris Romer has gotten ugly, and it appears to be the Romer people who came out swinging with very muddy hands. It seems like most of the Democratic Party people–the people who I normally am working with in a campaign–are supporting Romer. It also seems that most of the grassroots community organizers I’ve worked with over the years are supporting Michael.

I love Roy Romer, who used to be our Governor. He’s the candidate’s dad. I don’t like the candidate. He seems ill-prepared to manage a municipality. His only idea, and it’s not a new one, is to balance the city budget on the backs of its employees. He likes to brag that he knows all about funding because he’s an investment banker. Given the gang that created our current economic woes, I would not want one of them running my city. Telling someone that you managed construction of the building that no one can work in does not give you credibility.

There has been way too many column inches devoted to Michael’s “Pro-Choice” status. Is he pro-choice enough? And is it really relevant? What does Denver’s Mayor do where this might be an issue? Even the group who issued the Choice questions said the two candidates answered the same. I am more concerned about who gets appointed to head Public Works. That’s a big job requiring an ability to actually Get Things Done, not a chit to pay off a former opponent. I am more concerned about who gets appointed to run the airport. That, too, requires high level management skills and specialized experience in airport operations. It is not a place to stick a crony, particularly since DIA is the economic engine for the entire metro area.

When I think of my city being run by an amateur like Chris Romer, I shudder. Every quote in the papers shows his lack of basic municipal knowledge, his lack of Denver knowledge. Michael is the better of the two candidates. He understands the city and its workforce. He’s got my vote.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Spam and Eggs

JUST WHO ARE these people who keep sending me nonsense comments on my blog posts?? I post something mildly interesting, and I get comments that are cryptic at best. Some of them just send urls, but the same one thirty times in one comment. What does that do? What is being accomplished by my marking these people as spam??

It’s like a daily dose of WTF, these canned so-called “comments”. They arrive, rambling at length in an English-as-second-language way. They make broad-stroke statements about “learning” from a post that a human reader would have seen was not intended as a “learning experience.” And, no matter how many are relegated to that nice Spamcan wordpress offers, they keep coming back!

I write to amuse myself, and apparently, to attract bots. If there is a real live human being wishing to comment, and I don’t care if I LIKE the comment so long as it’s even passing relevant, I would be happy to show that comment to the other live person who reads these posts!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Denver Electionary

DENVER ELECTIONS are just a few days away, although I’m not sure why it still feels exciting when it’s an entirely mail-in ballot. We’re electing the next Alcalde, and there is no single clear front-runner. Since no one reads these posts except spammers, I think I’ll write about the candidates I like and why.

First, the Easy ones:
•Christopher Martinez has my vote for City Council district 11. I’ve worked with him for over 11 years, most of which time he’s been the RTD representative for our area. I moved here eleven years ago; he’s been a resident and a neighborhood activist in the district for well over 30 years. He gets involved. He gives solid advice. And he’s just a nice, smart neighborhood guy.

•Josh Davies was my next easy decision. Running for one of the City Council At Large positions, his background is in business. He’s a veep or something high-sounding for Sage Hospitality. He brings a balanced MOR approach that I think Council will benefit from if he is elected. What I like is he’s always asking people if he can get them anything–that hospitality industry background shows up with each new introduction. He was even trying to serve people at MY party last week!

•My other vote for CAL goes to Robin Kneitch. She has a law degree, although she seems to be more of a public interest project manager than an attorney. I like her sense of humor and her practical streak. I like her do-gooder fervor. I have never voted for someone because they’re GLBT. I think that it’s not a relevant qualification for most elected posts, except possibly Emperor and Empress of the Imperial Court of the Rocky Mountain Empire.

It’s a full house of candidates for Mayor, with three candidates dubbed front runners.

Chris Romer was endorsed by the Denver Post, which made me seriously question the Post’s intentions toward City Government. Romer is an investment banker turned candidate for various offices. He resigned as a state senator to run for mayor. He happens to be a son of my favorite governor of all time, Roy Romer. Roy is my BFF, but I’ve never found Chris to be warm or engaging.

Michael Hancock at least understands and has worked in City government. Michael is the current District 11 councilguy, and he’s done great work representing us. He’s smart and he thinks pretty well on his feet, normally. He has always had a larger picture driving his political actions–greater good, all that.

It seems like Doug Linkhart has been on city council forever. I think it’s that he’s been elected to several offices since I met him in the late 80s. Doug has always voted the way I would want on the issues that are important to me. He’s kind of a wonk, which I like. Westword portrayed him as an aging hippy with headband and tie-dye, but he’s really a serious liberal, and I like that too. He’s a neighborhood guy.

There are a handful of other candidates that I’ve only seen in some forums or read about. None of them seem to have the money-raising ability that being a serious candidate requires. I had some hopes for Carol Boigan and Theresa Spahn, but neither of them was able to light a spark.

I want a mayor who truly understands municipalities. I want a mayor who understands that Denver city has no control over Denver Public Schools, who understands that managing a municipality is not the same as managing a business. Governments operate under an entirely different set of rules than private businesses. People who complaint about big government don’t stop to think about the reasons for a government to exist–the services, the expectations, the limited sources for revenues. After the last elected guy, I want to see someone in place who actually values the people who work to keep that municipal business operating smoothly.

After thinking about it for a long time, I voted for James Mejia. He’s a smart guy with a lot of education, bootstraps and all that. More importantly, he has been an administrator under at least three previous mayors. That’s really rolling with the punches. He knows how government works; he knows how Denver works as a city. I wish he would provide more specific ideas about bringing money into Denver; I wish that about all the candidates, however, so that issue was a total wash.

So there you have it. Mayor Mejia, and three picks I think will make a very strong and progressive Denver city council. I hope he makes it into the runoff!

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

High Tee

I MANAGED TO GET IN MY FIRST golf lesson of the season the other day–that day before it got cold again. Surprisingly enough, I was hitting the ball very well before the instructor started watching. “Piece of cake,” I thought, “Who needs lessons.” Don’t know why I get so cocky over a handful of shots going where I think I hit them.

The thing about golf lessons is they’re a guarantee that your next game will be the most abysmal performance of your lifetime. I think I had a triple-par round the day after my last set of lessons.

So, the pro was watching me, and the first thing she adjusted was my grip, undoing a 15-year habit. I have always held a club like it was a baseball bat, and, yes, I swing the club like a bat too. Since I still managed to hit the ball, we had to change something else.

Balance. I wasn’t balanced as I swung my baseball bat club. She tried several methods of getting me to shift my weight in time with my arms; or maybe that was swing my arms with my weight shifting from right to left. This finally had the desired effect. I stopped hitting the ball anywhere.

She brought in the big guns, another pro who sells clubs. He had me making an exaggerated move from right to left, posing with my left foot up and the club upright against my chest while he counted to ten. I felt like a cartoon golfer. Then he did something fabulous; he gave me permission to chop at the ball. “Don’t swing,” he said. “Hack.” And hack I did, sending the ball a good 40 yards further than I had ever before.

That was his cue to check my clubs for proper fit. My clubs are a set my little brother gave me a few years ago, supplemented with a hodgepodge of clubs I’ve picked up over the years. They’re old, they’re mis-matched, and they’re too short and too light for me. I’m not about to purchase a new set this year; there are a few items in the pipeline ahead of that. Genius salesguy dangled a carrot in front of me anyway–when I buy a new set that’s right for me, I will halve my score.

Now, I’m waiting for the weather to cooperate so I can get that first post-lesson game out of the way. Watch out Michelle Wie!

Posted in Golf | Leave a comment

Scraps and Peaces

JUST FINISHED WATCHING all 24 episodes of The Scrapped Princess.  This is an anime that starts out as a sort of swords and sorcery tale about twins born to royalty.  The newborn girl is tossed over a cliff because of a prophecy that she will bring the end of the world.  She’s saved by a family and raised as their own, “Pacifica” –because her adoptive mother wants her to have a name that will make others like her.  The older brother and sister become her protectors as the storyline careens toward her 16th birthday.

There are many aspects that caught me–the episode titles with references to musical terms, the odd juxtaposition of horse-drawn wagons with AI fairies, the beginning and ending music, the art is stunning. Mostly, though, it was the theme of compassion vs cruelty born of fear. Pacifica is a voice of innocence that sometimes looks and acts imprudently, even to the point of seeming an idiot. I was reminded of the similar character in the Dostoyevski novel, The Idiot–representing that state of innocence and goodness that looks like stupidity to others. 

After an attack that kills their father, her brother and sister try to get her out of their country. It seems that everyone who meets Pacifica feels the need to defend her at some point. Unless they happen to be blood relatives or common soldiers, every random encounter the siblings have creates friends, including the princess of the neighboring land. 

For a while, the story belabors the differences between the two princesses, both of whom experienced cruelty and rejection from their birth families. The other princess grows up a warrior and has limited use for Pacifica. This is where the story starts to get clever. Up to this point, everything has been about swordplay and magic. Once Princess Seness shows up, the language changes to robotics and algorithms. And it’s a whole new world that the characters live in.

Again, the intriguing thing is it doesn’t matter whether we’re dealing in magic shields or attacking “Peacekeepers” armed with missiles and directed by advanced artificial intelligence modules. The theme holds true to the end, when Pacifica meets their God.

Peace, innocence, sacrifice for another on one side. Cruelty, cowardice and condescension are on the other side in this great battle for the future. Highly entertaining little cartoon; this was not what I expected. It was well worth the time spent in watching each half-hour segment. I am quite glad to have stumbled upon this story.  Quite the gift!

Posted in Comics | Leave a comment

Let Them Eat Cake

WHILE TALKING WITH A FRIEND over the most wonderful vegan chocolate cake, he started asking me questions about his experience with a real estate agent.  First question: Do you know so-and-so with XYZ real estate?  I suppose I could call this agent Humbug, but maybe I’ll go with Queen Beryl.

A gay man, he called the agent because she was lesbian and affiliated with a firm with a name that sounded like it would focus on the type of home he wanted to buy.  Reasonable presumption on his part, but I would recommend getting referrals from friends or co-workers too.

Turns out he and Queen Beryl did not get along.  She refused to show him homes in the style he asked for, and she persisted in showing him homes above his preferred price range because he could afford more.  As an aside, in the Denver real estate market, there are a lot of homes in his preferred range ($300-350K).  She insisted that he use her mortgage person, and she got angry with him when he wanted to use his own home inspector after determining that he didn’t trust the one she preferred.

Every story has multiple versions.  Over a martini, Queen Beryl might tell me the horror story of the client who thought he knew better than her and fought her on every issue.  I prefer my clients use a mortgage broker I know and have worked with; it can make a huge difference in whether or not we close.  And, I’ve had a few clients who refused to listen to me. It is a nightmare.  The difference is that I have fired them rather than putting them and me through additional agony.

If I genuinely think my client should be looking in a higher price range, I do the homework to show her why I think it’s in her best interest.  Client is always the decision-maker; I just try to make a strong case for my position in the discussion.  Sometimes the properties just aren’t there.

But what of that contract he signed?  Yes, it says they agree to work together for a specific time period.  And I do insist that people who want to buy sign such an agreement with me, normally the second or third time we tour.  (Here’s another aside–in Colorado, the very first time I meet a potential client, I must present a disclosure that describes the ways I can work with him or her.  Hopefully, potential client signs the document. Otherwise, I note it was presented and file it away.)

So, if I have a client who tells me he doesn’t want to work with me any more, I have two options.  I can say, “you’ve got a contract and you’re going to work with me, Buster.”  Why would I do that?  Is a commission so important that I would make myself and another person miserable in order to get it?  I choose door number two, and after exploring reasons for the termination (maybe it’s a communication problem, maybe it’s something I can fix, maybe they want to use their brother-in-law) I will agree to part ways immediately.

Unlike Queen Beryl, I try to not have ego investment with my clients.  My job is to provide a service to the best of my ability.  If that does not meet a client’s requirements for any reason, and I can not make it better, then the job description includes getting out of their way!

Posted in Real Estate | Leave a comment

Blind Dates

ONE OF MY MORTGAGE GUYS called me and said he has a client meeting him this evening.  He wants me to be there and meet the client.

It’s a great thing, really–someone feeding me a potential lead for business.  I am grateful he thought of me, since mortgage guys usually have a stable full of real estate agents to choose from when they give referrals.

And, at the same time, I’m having my misgivings.  Maybe it’s because I’ve never done much dating; I find it awkward to meet someone in this way.  It’s difficult when someone tells me to call their friend who needs a realtor, out of the blue, too.  Even when they’ve prepped that call, it’s uncomfortable. Obviously, I do it, and I hope I do it well with social grace and aplomb.

And yet, before the call, before the meeting, the mind is racing with all these gawky adolescent self-doubts and questions.  “Is my hair all right?” “what do I wear?” “is everything clean?” I feel awfully small as I go through this churn, but the reality is People decide whether or not they want to work with an agent within 30 seconds of meeting.

Before I was a realtor, I was a home buyer.  I was referred to an agent by an acquaintance.  When I met that guy, all I could think of was a doorman in the Land of Oz from one of the original drawings by John O’Neill.  He had a super high forehead and talked non-stop. He was glib and a little sexist and racist, and I hated him almost immediately.  His name was something similar to hamburger, so I called him “Humbug.”

Because I didn’t know anyone else, I did use his services. The problem with Humbug was that in all that wave of chatter coming from him, he buried what he did for me when I bought the house.  I spent the next seven years hating him and the house, and I never appreciated his competence (or that house!) until I became a realtor myself.  I don’t want to be “that guy.” I don’t want to be a Humbug!

So, yes, I’m hoping this person and I hit it off in 30 seconds or less.  I hoping we have a “second date,” and I get to show him or her some great properties and help with purchasing one of them.  And, I’m hoping I don’t have any spinach in my teeth!

Posted in Real Estate | Leave a comment

Full Moon

I SPENT all of last weekend attending the Anime Wasabi convention.  It seemed like a logical thing to do, at least at the time.  I love comics of all kinds (except Cathy and Garfield), and I knew next-to-nothing about Anime.  Here was my opportunity to learn a lot more, and hopefully make some connections for potential real estate clients.

So, I volunteered to help the con organizers.  The volunteer coordinator was a young woman named Irony.  (She rolled her eyes at me and said “yes, that’s my name” when I repeated it.)  Unfortunately, I kept calling her Ivory the remainder of the weekend.  Just the way the letters rearranged inside my head…

When not helping, I was free to wander.  Lots of people in costumes; of course I had no idea who they might be imitating.  I noticed one woman who seemed to change her clothing every other hour! 

I ended up in a small room watching a continuous stream of cartoons I had never heard of before.  And I wanted more! 

Now, I’m way behind and have no time in my schedule for getting my business marketed.  But I can sit through several online episodes of the series that hooked me! I only have 190 more shows before I’m finished with Sailor Moon!  By the Moon, I will punish you!

Posted in Comics | Leave a comment